Showing posts with label tRNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tRNA. Show all posts

Mar 2, 2021

Origin of life: The chicken-and-the-egg problem

 A Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich team has shown that slight alterations in transfer-RNA molecules (tRNAs) allow them to self-assemble into a functional unit that can replicate information exponentially. tRNAs are key elements in the evolution of early life-forms.

Life as we know it is based on a complex network of interactions, which take place at microscopic scales in biological cells, and involve thousands of distinct molecular species. In our bodies, one fundamental process is repeated countless times every day. In an operation known as replication, proteins duplicate the genetic information encoded in the DNA molecules stored in the cell nucleus -- before distributing them equally to the two daughter cells during cell division. The information is then selectively copied ('transcribed') into what are called messenger RNA molecules (mRNAs), which direct the synthesis of the many different proteins required by the cell type concerned. A second type of RNA -- transfer RNA (tRNA) -- plays a central role in the 'translation' of mRNAs into proteins. Transfer RNAs act as intermediaries between mRNAs and proteins: they ensure that the amino-acid subunits of which each particular protein consists are put together in the sequence specified by the corresponding mRNA.

How could such a complex interplay between DNA replication and the translation of mRNAs into proteins have arisen when living systems first evolved on the early Earth? We have here a classical example of the chicken-and-the-egg problem: Proteins are required for transcription of the genetic information, but their synthesis itself depends on transcription.

LMU physicists led by Professor Dieter Braun have now demonstrated how this conundrum could have been resolved. They have shown that minor modifications in the structures of modern tRNA molecules permit them to autonomously interact to form a kind of replication module, which is capable of exponentially replicating information. This finding implies that tRNAs -- the key intermediaries between transcription and translation in modern cells -- could also have been the crucial link between replication and translation in the earliest living systems. It could therefore provide a neat solution to the question of which came first -- genetic information or proteins?

Strikingly, in terms of their sequences and overall structure, tRNAs are highly conserved in all three domains of life, i.e. the unicellular Archaea and Bacteria (which lack a cell nucleus) and the Eukaryota (organisms whose cells contain a true nucleus). This fact in itself suggests that tRNAs are among the most ancient molecules in the biosphere.

Like the later steps in the evolution of life, the evolution of replication and translation -- and the complex relationship between them -- was not the result of a sudden single step. It is better understood as the culmination of an evolutionary journey. "Fundamental phenomena such as self-replication, autocatalysis, self-organization and compartmentalization are likely to have played important roles in these developments," says Dieter Braun. "And on a more general note, such physical and chemical processes are wholly dependent on the availability of environments that provide non-equilibrium conditions."

In their experiments, Braun and his colleagues used a set of reciprocally complementary DNA strands modeled on the characteristic form of modern tRNAs. Each was made up of two 'hairpins' (so called because each strand could partially pair with itself and form an elongated loop structure), separated by an informational sequence in the middle. Eight such strands can interact via complementary base-pairing to form a complex. Depending on the pairing patterns dictated by the central informational regions, this complex was able to encode a 4-digit binary code.

Each experiment began with a template -- an informational structure made up of two types of the central informational sequences that define a binary sequence. This sequence dictated the form of the complementary molecule with which it can interact in the pool of available strands. The researchers went on to demonstrate that the templated binary structure can be repeatedly copied, i.e. amplified, by applying a repeating sequence of temperature fluctuations between warm and cold. "It is therefore conceivable that such a replication mechanism could have taken place on a hydrothermal microsystem on the early Earth," says Braun. In particular, aqueous solutions trapped in porous rocks on the seafloor would have provided a favorable environment for such reaction cycles, since natural temperature oscillations, generated by convection currents, are known to occur in such settings.

During the copying process, complementary strands (drawn from the pool of molecules) pair up with the informational segment of the template strands. In the course of time, the adjacent hairpins of these strands also pair up to form a stable backbone, and temperature oscillations continue to drive the amplification process. If the temperature is increased for a brief period, the template strands are separated from the newly formed replicate, and both can then serve as template strands in the next round of replication.

The team was able to show that the system is capable of exponential replication. This is an important finding, as it shows that the replication mechanism is particularly resistant to collapse owing to the accumulation of errors. The fact that the structure of the replicator complex itself resembles that of modern tRNAs suggests that early forms of tRNA could have participated in molecular replication processes, before tRNA molecules assumed their modern role in the translation of messenger RNA sequences into proteins. "This link between replication and translation in an early evolutionary scenario could provide a solution to the chicken-and-the-egg problem," says Alexandra Kühnlein. It could also account for the characteristic form of proto-tRNAs, and elucidate the role of tRNAs before they were co-opted for use in translation.

Read more at Science Daily

Feb 28, 2021

Measuring the tRNA world

 Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) deliver specific amino acids to ribosomes during translation of messenger RNA into proteins. The abundance of tRNAs can therefore have a profound impact on cell physiology, but measuring the amount of each tRNA in cells has been limited by technical challenges. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry have now overcome these limitations with mim-tRNAseq, a method that can be used to quantify tRNAs in any organism and will help improve our understanding of tRNA regulation in health and disease.

A cell contains several hundred thousand tRNA molecules, each of which consists of only 70 to 90 nucleotides folded into a cloverleaf-like pattern. At one end, tRNAs carry one of the twenty amino acids that serve as protein building blocks, while the opposite end pairs with the codon specifying this amino acid in messenger RNA during translation. Although there are only 61 codons for the twenty amino acids, cells from different organisms can contain hundreds of unique tRNA molecules, some of which differ from each other by only a single nucleotide. Many nucleotides in tRNAs are also decorated with chemical modifications, which help tRNAs fold or bind the correct codon.

The levels of individual tRNAs are dynamically regulated in different tissues and during development, and tRNA defects are linked to neurogical diseases and cancer. The molecular origins of these links remain unclear, because quantifying the abundance and modifications of tRNAs in cells has long remained a challenge. The team of Danny Nedialkova at the MPI of Biochemistry has now developed mim-tRNAseq, a method that accurately measures the abundance and modification status of different tRNAs in cells.

Modification roadblocks and resolutions

To measure the levels of multiple RNAs simultaneously, scientists use an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to first rewrite RNA into DNA. Millions of these DNA copies can then be quantified in parallel by high-throughput sequencing. Rewriting tRNAs into DNA has been tremendously hard since many tRNA modifications block the reverse transcriptase, causing it to stop synthesizing DNA.

"Many researches have proposed elegant solutions to this problem, but all of them relieve only a fraction of the modification roadblocks in tRNAs," explains Danny Nedialkova, Max Planck Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry. "We noticed that one specific reverse transcriptase seemed to be much better at reading through modified tRNA sites. By optimizing the reaction conditions, we could significantly improve the enzyme's efficiency, enabling it to read through nearly all tRNA modification roadblocks," adds Nedialkova. This made it possible to construct DNA libraries from full-length tRNA copies and use them for high-throughput sequencing.

The mim-tRNAseq computational toolkit


The analysis of the resulting sequencing data also presented significant challenges. "We identified two major issues: the first one is the extensive sequence similarity between different tRNA transcripts," explains Andrew Behrens, PhD student in Nedialkova's group and first author of the paper. "The second one comes from the fact that an incorrect nucleotide (a misincorporation) is introduced at many modified sites during reverse transcription. Both make it extremely challenging to assign each DNA read to the tRNA molecule it originated from," adds Behrens.

Read more at Science Daily