Humans need Earth-like ecosystem for deep-space living

Can humans endure long-term living in deep space? The answer is a lukewarm maybe, according to a new theory describing the complexity of maintaining gravity and oxygen, obtaining water, developing agriculture and handling waste far from Earth.

Dubbed the Pancosmorio theory -- a word coined to mean "all world limit" -- it was described in a paper published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences.

"For humans to sustain themselves and all of their technology, infrastructure and society in space, they need a self-restoring, Earth-like, natural ecosystem to back them up," said co-author Morgan Irons, a doctoral student conducting research with Johannes Lehmann, professor in the School of Integrative Plant Science at Cornell University. Her work focuses on soil organic carbon persistence under Earth's gravity and varying gravity conditions. "Without these kinds of systems, the mission fails."

The first key is gravity, which Earth life needs to function properly, said co-author Lee Irons, Morgan Irons' father and executive director of the Norfolk Institute, a group that aims to solve problems of human resilience on Earth and in space.

"Gravity induces a gradient in the fluid pressure within the body of the living thing to which the autonomic functions of the life form are attuned," he said. "An example of gravity imbalance would be the negative affect on the eyesight of humans in Earth orbit, where they don't experience the weight necessary to induce the pressure gradient."

Morgan Irons said that it would be unwise to spend billions of dollars to set up a space settlement only to see it fail, because even with all other systems in place, you need gravity.

Humans and all Earth life have evolved within the context of 1G of gravity. "Our bodies, our natural ecosystems, all the energy movement and the way we utilize energy is all fundamentally based upon 1G of gravity being present," she said. "There is just no other place in space where there is 1G of gravity; that just doesn't exist anywhere else in our solar system. That's one of the first problems we must solve."

Oxygen is another key factor. Earth's ecosystem generates oxygen for humans and other life forms. If a technologically advanced primary and a back-up system failed to provide oxygen for the moon base, for example, it would mean instant doom for the astronauts. "A reserve exists everywhere in Earth's nature," Lee Irons said. "Think of the hundreds of thousands of species of plants that generate oxygen. That's the kind of system reserve we need to replicate to be truly sustainable."

Such an ecological system of an outpost would need an enormous amount energy from the sun. The more distant planets and moons from the sun in our own solar system get decreased amounts of energy.

Read more at Science Daily

Proposed spacecraft navigation uses x-rays from dead stars

The remnants of a collapsed neutron star, called a pulsar, are magnetically charged and spinning anywhere from one rotation per second to hundreds of rotations per second. These celestial bodies, each 12 to 15 miles in diameter, generate light in the x-ray wavelength range. Researchers at The Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign developed a new way spacecraft can use signals from multiple pulsars to navigate in deep space.

"We can use star trackers to determine the direction a spacecraft is pointing, but to learn the precise location of the spacecraft, we rely on radio signals sent between the spacecraft and the Earth, which can take a lot of time and requires use of oversubscribed infrastructure, like NASA's Deep Space Network," said Zach Putnam, professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Illinois.

"Using x-ray navigation eliminates those two factors, but until now, required an initial position estimate of the spacecraft as a starting point. This research presents a system that finds candidates for possible spacecraft locations without prior information, so the spacecraft can navigate autonomously."

"Also, our ground communication systems for deep space missions are overloaded right now," he said. "This system would give spacecraft autonomy and reduce the dependency on the ground. X-ray pulsar navigation gets us around that and allows us to determine where we are, without calling."

Putnam said because our atmosphere filters out all the x-rays, you have to be in space to observe them. The pulsars emit electromagnetic radiation that look like pulses because we measure the peak in the x-ray signals every time the pulsar spins around and points toward us -- like the ray of light cast from the beacon on a lighthouse.

"Each pulsar has its own characteristic signal, like a fingerprint," he said. "We have records of the x-rays over time from the 2,000 or so pulsars and how they've changed over time."

Much like the Global Positioning System, location can be determined from intersection of three signals.

"The issue with pulsars is that they spin so fast that the signal repeats itself a lot," he said. "By comparison, GPS repeats every two weeks. With pulsars, while there are an infinite number of possible spacecraft locations, we know how far apart these candidate locations are from each other.

"We are looking at determining spacecraft position within domains that have diameters on the order of multiple astronomical units, like the size of the orbit of Jupiter -- something like a square with one billion miles on a side. The challenge we are trying to address is, how do we intelligently observe pulsars and fully determine all possible spacecraft locations in a domain without using an excessive amount of compute resources," Putnam said.

The algorithm developed by graduate student Kevin Lohan combines observations from numerous pulsars to determine all the possible positions of the spacecraft. The algorithm processes all the candidate intersections in two dimensions or three dimensions.

Read more at Science Daily

Immense set of mysterious fast radio bursts

An international team of astronomers recently observed more than 1,650 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected from one source in deep space, which amounts to the largest set -- by far -- of the mysterious phenomena ever recorded.

More than a decade after the discovery of FRBs, astronomers are still baffled by the origins of the millisecond-long, cosmic explosions that each produce the energy equivalent to the sun's annual output.

In a study published in the Oct. 13 issue of the journal Nature, scientists -- including UNLV astrophysicist Bing Zhang -- report on the discovery of a total of 1,652 independent FRBs from one source over the course of 47 days in 2019. The source, dubbed FRB 121102, was observed using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) in China, and represents more FRBs in one event than all previous reported occurrences combined.

"This was the first time that one FRB source was studied in such great detail," said Zhang, one of the study's corresponding authors. "The large burst set helped our team home in like never before on the characteristic energy and energy distribution of FRBs, which sheds new light on the engine that powers these mysterious phenomena."

Since FRBs were first discovered in 2007, astronomers worldwide have turned to powerful radio telescopes like FAST to trace the bursts and to look for clues on where they come from and how they're produced. The source that powers most FRBs is widely believed to be magnetars, incredibly dense, city-sized neutron stars that possess the strongest magnetic fields in the universe. And while scientists are gaining greater clarity on what produces FRBs, the exact location of where they occur is still a mystery.

A mystery that recent results may be starting to unravel.

According to Zhang, there are two active models for where FRBs come from. One could be that they come from magnetospheres, or within a magnetar's strong magnetic field. Another theory is that FRBs form from relativistic shocks outside the magnetosphere traveling the speed of light.

"These results pose great challenges to the latter model," says Zhang. "The bursts are too frequent and -- given that this episode alone amounts to 3.8% of the energy available from a magnetar -- it adds up to too much energy for the second model to work."

The bursts were measured by FAST within a total of 59.5 hours over 47 days from Aug. 29 to Oct. 29, 2019.

"During its most active phase, FRB 121102 included 122 bursts measured within a one-hour period, the highest repeat rate ever observed for any FRB," said Pei Wang, one of the article's lead authors from the National Astronomical Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC).

Researchers expect that FAST will continue to systematically investigate a large number of repeating FRBs in the future.

"As the world's largest antenna, FAST's sensitivity proves to be conducive to revealing intricacies of cosmic transients, including FRBs," said Di Li, the study's lead researcher from NAOC.

Read more at Science Daily