That’s because the Earth’s atmosphere is a chaotic system that doesn’t follow an easily predictable path, according to Keith Seitter, executive director of the American Meteorological Society in Boston.
“If anybody kept track about how (AccuWeather) did, they would find it’s a pretty horrible forecast,” Seitter said.
The best weather forecasters can do now is seven to 10 days. After that, accuracy drops off quickly.
The good news is that forecasting has gotten better over the years. Improvements in computer technology, data collection and weather models have improved this forecasting number about one day each decade.
One of the biggest advancements has come in boosting computer power. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the parent agency of the National Weather Service, operates supercomputers in Reston, Va., (“Luna”) and Orlando, Fla., (“Surge”) to come up with weather forecasts.
After a $44 million upgrade in January, each one has the capacity of 2.89 petaflops, or 2.89 quadrillion calculations per second, according to Richard Michaud, director of NOAA’s office of central processing. That’s up from 778 teraflops (1 petaflop equals 1,000 teraflops) of computing power last year.
In simpler terms, it means that the faster, bigger computers will allow the agency’s scientists to:
- Better predict the amount, timing and type of precipitation in both winter storms and thunderstorms
- Create “water forecasts” and more accurately predict drought and floods
- Connect the air, ocean and waves to track eight hurricanes at once
These supercomputers are the brains behind the weather forecasts you see on TV each night or your smartphone when you wake up.
“Its not just about adding more computing time,” he said. “You have to have the appropriate way to assimilate the data into the models.”
Building better models is the work of computer scientists, climate scientists and meteorologists.
In this instance, the European forecast model (which includes forecasts for both the United States and Europe) has a slight advantage over the U.S. weather model. That’s because the European weather agency has fewer weather-related forecasts to produce, according to Seitter, so they can focus more effort on one product.
Read more at Discovery News
No comments:
Post a Comment