|
Homo erectus |
Since the discovery in 2007 of Callao Man — represented by a Homo sapiens foot bone excavated at Callao Cave — humans were thought to have first lived in the Philippines about 67,000 years ago.
Now that number needs to be multiplied nearly 11 times, as an international team of researchers has just discovered strong evidence that early humans were in the Philippines by at least 709,000 years ago. The evidence, reported in the journal Nature, consists of 57 stone tools and an almost complete disarticulated skeleton of a butchered rhinoceros.
"There are obviously two questions to answer at present," lead author Thomas Ingicco of the National Museum of Natural History in Paris told Seeker. "One is who made the stone tools and butchered the rhino."
"The other question is the origin of the dispersion," he added, referring to how the toolmakers and rhino wound up in a bucolic part of the Philippines.
The new findings, as well as prior research, provide clues.
First, there is the location of the artifacts and animal bones, which also include the remains of brown deer, monitor lizards, freshwater turtles, and stegodons — members of an extinct genus similar to elephants and mammoths. All were found at a site called Kalinga in the Cagayan Valley of northern Luzon Island, Philippines.
"By 700,000 years ago, Homo erectus seems to have been present everywhere in Asia," Ingicco said. "We have fossils from China and Java in Indonesia, and some are much older than the Kalinga site as we have evidence as early as 1.8 million years ago in those places."
The Kalinga toolmakers therefore could have been Homo erectus individuals. They might have traveled to the Philippines along one of four possible gateways, according to Ingicco and his team. The first, a northern route, is from China via Taiwan. The second, a southern approach, is from Sulawesi via the Sangihe Islands. The third, a southwestern route, is from Borneo via the Sulu Archipelago, and the fourth, a northwestern approach, is from Borneo via Palawan Island.
The trip perhaps was not intentional.
"Colonization of the islands could have been possible thanks to natural rafts, such as floating mangroves that typhoons occasionally break off the coast," Ingicco said. "These floating islands would have come with animals and possibly hominins (early humans) on them. Such natural rafts are quite well documented for historical periods and it is therefore a likely way of colonizing Luzon Island during the mid-Pleistocene by hominins."
He added, however, that "floating islands cannot be recovered by archaeological means nor can some kind of watercraft for such an old archaeological site."
The latter is important, because the scientists cannot rule out that the Kalinga toolmakers constructed their own boat, raft, or other means of water transportation. The distance then was too far for human swimming, so the scientists can at least negate that idea.
"If these hominins were capable of constructing some sort of watercraft, then it would indeed be an extraordinary discovery," Ingicco said.
|
Professor Chris Stringer of the Natural
History Museum holds his hand over a Homo floresiensis skull (L) that
was found at a cave site called Liang Bua that belonged to an individual
who, while fully adult, was barley a meter tall and had a skull the
size of a grapefruit. |
The researchers also cannot rule out that the Kalinga toolmakers were Homo floresiensis, aka the Hobbit Humans, so named because of their diminutive size and the popularity of "The Lord of the Rings" film series that was in theaters during the time of the hominins' discovery. The island of Flores, where Homo floresiensis remains were found, is just south of the Philippines.
Conversely, the Kalinga toolmakers could have eventually made their way down to Flores, and Homo floresiensis evolved from them. They could have been small even before they took such a hypothetical journey.
Ingicco explained, "Luzon Island might have been the place for similar endemic evolution of hominins into dwarfism, just like what happened on Flores."
Caley Orr of the University of Colorado, Denver has studied Homo floresiensis and other early humans. Orr told Seeker that it has been previously theorized "that a population of Homo erectus was stranded on the island of Flores and became 'dwarfed' over time, which sometimes happens to larger animals that adapt to small island environments."
Orr added, "Homo floresiensis probably went extinct by at least 13,000 years ago." That is relatively recent, in terms of overall human history.
Ignicco and his colleagues say it is also possible that an entirely different and as-of-yet unknown hominin made the Kalinga tools and was the first to settle the Philippines. The tools unfortunately do not shed light on this matter.
Made from pebbles, the tools were simple in construction but knapped — that is, shaped by striking, which in this case occurred on anvils.
"Anvil technology is actually found in different places around the world, and it seems to always be used whenever the pebbles are too hard to be knapped in these other places," Ignicco said. "In France, for example, anvils were used to produce tools from quartzite by 1.1 million years ago."
One excavated pebble at Kalinga was five times larger than the rest. The researchers do not think that it arrived at the site by natural transport, such as flowing in from a river, so they suspect that it was intentionally brought to the area by the early humans, who perhaps used it as an anvil or in their butchering of the rhino.
The rhino — the now-extinct Rhinoceros philippinensis — appears to have been savored. Cut marks reveal that its consumers likely stripped off the meat and smashed its bones to gain access to the animal's marrow. Remarkably, 75 percent of the rhino's remains were found during the excavation.
Prehistoric human migrants often seemed to adhere to a simple rule: follow the meat — or fish. Evidence is mounting that early humans tracked animal migrations on land, leading them into new territories. During settlement of the Americas, for example, the kelp highway hypothesis holds that some of the first Americans colonized the New World by following coastlines and seafood-rich kelp forests from north to south.
Read more at
Seeker